Posts Tagged 'Green shoots'



The Vincenator

Hail to the Vince. Let’s give thanks for the continued presence of Vincent Cable, MP for Twickenham, and 2008 Parliamentarian of the Year.

You might say that it’s not a vintage crop of parliamentarians right now; but I’ve noticed a new question in the last 12 months from the people on my media training courses. How can I sound more like Vince Cable?, they ask me, dolefully. The obvious answer is that you need to get a PhD in economics, work overseas and at a high level in international business, get elected to parliament while developing an independent set of opinions, work hard, mostly in obscurity, for a number of years, and then arrange some kind of global crisis in which you are an expert, but about which almost everyone else knows nothing.

Of course, if it was that easy, we’d all be doing it.

I was thinking about the Cable effect on Wednesday when I was listening to him speak at the Association for Qualitative Research Trends Day. He spoke for 45 minutes with (no notes) about the economic crisis, why British people are obsessed

Cable: in real life, surprisingly athletic

Cable: in real life, surprisingly athletic

with pets and houses, the role of markets and the nature of identity. Most conferences I go to make me want to stab my hand with a pencil. But we keep going back to these PowerPoint-crazed snoozefests, because every now and then a Vince Cable shows up.

So, to the original question: how do you sound more like the Vincenator? I came up with a list while I was listening.

1. What’s the problem? It’s more important to identify a problem accurately than to pretend you have all the answers. I think there’s got to be a some element of peril if you’re ignored. So when he warned us that the next British parliament might be run by a conservative government with no Scottish MPs, in conflict with a nationalist Scottish parliament and tells us “it’s an unsustainable tension”, you start thinking. He wasn’t saying there will be a war or anything, just waking us up. At least, I don’t think he was.

2. Not the usual stats. Did you know that in the recession, employment in the UK among pensioners had actually increased? That in many parts of London the average house price is 100 times average earnings? Neither did I. I could have looked the second one up, but Cable saved me the effort.

3. Now I get it. His stats don’t just sit there, they are part of a story. So he points out that UK public spending is 49 per cent of GDP and that taxation is 35 per cent and sinking: “Scandinavian type public spending supported by American levels of taxation.”

4. Small-BIG-Small. Take a small point, explain the big picture, then explain how that affects something else personal. Moving between big and small is the mark of someone who really knows what they’re talking about. So Cable riffs on bonuses and MP expenses, gives some insight on how we rightly feel the world is unfair, and warns it will seem even more like that when entitlements that we expected (free university education, for example) are denied to our children.

5. Bite the hand that feeds you. You only root for an underdog when your underdog bites a bit. “After I made my speech advocating a mansion tax I went to the press room and there were about 50 of them and they were like piranhas. Then I realised almost all of them have £1 million homes”.

6. You sow before you reap. Any bugger can tell you now that liberalised markets and the pursuit of risky profits were destructive for Northern Rock. But only Cable can say that he was leading a campaign against demutualisation of building societies 10 years ago. Anyone can be wise after the event, but the high ground goes to people who were wise before it. To do that, you have to have opinions today that don’t follow the herd. This is thought leadership, not what everyone else pretends it is.

For all this, and for helping to show that it is appropriate to admire bald men, Vince Cable is today’s inductee into our Hall of Fame as a Hero of Talknormalism. I’ll put him in the list and send him a mug to celebrate this achievement: a reward that makes others seem mere trinkets. Of course, if he doesn’t say thank you, I’ll put up a post saying how over-rated he is. He’s a politician, he’d understand.

The Talk Normal Files (again)

I have lovingly saved this in the Talk Normal vaults. I promise I don’t live in a flat piled high with old newspapers, pointing at stories about words and shouting SEE WHAT I MEAN!! to the guy from Tesco who delivers my shopping. I’m saving that pleasure for my retirement.

This one from The Telegraph, October 7 2008 (I think):

plain speaking

So it’s year old, but I wasn’t writing a blog then. Oh how I’ve waited for this moment.

This set me thinking: when did we start talking about stakeholder engagement? I resolved to find out. Don’t worry about me mum. I know how to enjoy my leisure time.

So I looked it up. Guess: when was the first time you heard about it?

The first mention I could find was in a magazine article from 1996 in which, in the first sentence, negotiators in the medical industry were described as lightning rods that take heat and keep things on track. Like a grammatical godzilla sowing the seeds of a paradigm shift, this triple mixed metaphor seems to have created a wormhole that sucked stakeholder engagement into the published language.

Being both ugly and hard to understand, the phrase took time to catch on: there are only 10 published mentions anywhere in the world before the millennium – and two of them were in a story about a magazine for Balkan immigrants.

After the year 2000 it really caught on:

Stakeholder engagement

The initial impetus, and most of the coverage through the middle years of the decade, came from the new discipline of sustainability reporting: oil, gas and energy magazines were the big users. The energy companies might still have been despoiling the environment, but at least they had found a fancy phrase for the process of asking us what we thought about it. Later the phrase began to spread out to other industries such as gambling and public relations, eventually reaching Harrow Council – until it was stopped.

I’ve only looked at magazine and newspaper articles. In meeting rooms and conference calls there are no copy editors to act as lightning rods and take the heat to keep us on track.

For the record: I like new words. I enjoy change and am down with where the kids are at. I don’t smoke a pipe. I also feel that sustainability reporting has done a lot of good. But by giving bureaucrats this new phrase with which to confuse us, sustainability reporting has also caused its own special type of pollution.

« Previous Page


Cut out your waffle: buy my book

Type your email and click the button and you will automatically get every new post.

“This excellent collection” (Director Magazine). Click to order:

I tweet


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 171 other followers